BITEVOAGENT SYSTEMS Scope an audit
Local workflow diagnostic

Seven gates. No fake trust score.

Answer YES / NO / UNKNOWN for one real workflow. Nothing is transmitted. The result is a list of unresolved decision gates — not certification, a vulnerability verdict or a numerical safety rating.

Read the doctrine →
01
Authority BudgetCan you name the exact external action this workflow is allowed to perform?
02
Object bindingCan the workflow prove which exact object the action applies to before execution?
03
Authority ownerIs there a named role that owns the permission to perform this action?
04
Evidence Before EffectIs the minimum pre-action evidence explicitly defined?
05
FreshnessDoes the workflow know when required evidence has become stale or invalid?
06
External confirmationIs the intended external effect independently confirmed after the action?
07
RecoveryWhen evidence or confirmation becomes uncertain, does the workflow enter a defined constrained/recovery state?
How to use it

Unknown is a valid engineering answer.

YES

The gate is explicit enough to describe. An audit may still test whether the implementation actually behaves that way.

NO

The workflow lacks the gate or currently behaves in a way that does not satisfy it.

UNKNOWN

The team cannot yet prove the gate. BitEvo treats that uncertainty as something to preserve and resolve, not silently convert into a pass.